Rogers J.E., Solomon, W.D., Rector, A.L., Pole P.M.,P Zanstra, E van der Haring. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;43 Pt A:241-5  @ NUS  Home/Search   Document Not in Database   Summary   Related Articles   Check

....be pre negotiated among modellers before some relevant part of the model is constructed, or are discovered through browsing over time and from experience. 1.3. THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GRAIL MODEL 32 However, well defined recipes can be made into macros or embodied in an intermediate representation [134]. These intermediate representations are devised for the benefit of other modellers with less experience in GRAIL. They are macros that expand into GRAIL descriptions eventually, but they allow domain experts without an in depth knowledge of GRAIL to contribute to a model s development. The ....

....a GRAIL model is like programming, except that it is not as well studied or understood. The modellers subjective view of the domain affects the style and structure of the model, just as with programmers of software implementations. Methodologies of modelling are just beginning to be studied [134]. Conventions like meaningful naming for concept do exists however. The interaction between the model and modellers is complex. Modellers need to avoid and resolve non sensical cases as well as spotting omissions. The whole philosophy behind modelling in GRAIL is to promote parsimony: use the ....

[Article contains additional citation context not shown here]

ROGERS,J.,SOLOMON,W.,RECTOR, A., POLE,P.,ZANSTRA,P.,AND VAN DER HARING, E. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. In Medical Informatics Europe '97 (Thessaloniki, Greece, 1997), IOS Press Vol 43, pp. 241--245.

....conceptual models are often complex, multi dimensional graphs that are difficult to manage. The DL GRAIL has associated tools to shield the ontologist from the logical formalism. An intermediate template form is used to represent the conceptualisation, from which the encoding can be generated [38]. These tools also usually contain mechanisms for visualising and checking the resulting model over and above the logical means for checking the satisfiability of the specified model. The MBO also has an editor for creating and visualising the object based encoding used in that ontology [2] ....

J.E. Rogers, W.D. Solomon, A.L. Rector, P.M. Pole, P. Zanstra, and van der Haring E. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. In Medical Informatics Europe '97, pages 241--245, Amsterdam, 1997. IOS Press Vol 43.

....in the medical domain many of the ideas concerning terminology servers discussed in this paper were developed during GALEN. In the follow on GALEN in USE project, a TeS Figure 2: The architecture of a server is being used to help in constructing the next generation of medical coding schemes [17], relying on the automated classification to improve the consistency and coherency of the static schemes. Multilingual support is provided, facilitating the sharing of terminologies between international communities, and extraction mechanisms are provided which enable local terminology snapshots ....

J. E. Rogers, Solomon W. D., A. L. Rector, P. Pole, P. Zanstra, and E. van der Haring. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. In MIE 97, 1997.

....extensive training. An easier syntax and less complex semantics were needed. The GALEN Intermediate 258 Representation (Intermediate Representation) and an associated toolset SPET and TIGGER for authoring and processing Intermediate Representation dissections were born of this requirement [11][12] 13] A major value of the Common Reference Model is as an index and link to other resources such as static coding schemes or items in decision support systems and EPRs surgical procedure codes in GALEN IN USE, drug interactions, indications, and other information in the PRODIGY GP protocol ....

Rogers J.E., Solomon, W.D., Rector, A.L., Pole P.M.,P Zanstra, E van der Haring. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1997;43 Pt A:241-5

No context found.

Rogers JE, Solomon WD et al. (1997) Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. Fifteenth International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, MIE-97 Thessaloniki, Greece

No context found.

Rogers J, Solomon W, Rector A, Pole P, Zanstra P, van der Haring E. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. Medical Informatics Europe '97, IOS Press, 1997: 241-245

No context found.

Rogers J.E., WD Solomon, Rector, A.L., Pole P.M.,P Zanstra, E van der Haring, (1997) Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications C. Pappas et al. (Eds.) Medical Informatics Europe '97, IOS Press;:241-245.

....is made of metadata and templates. Intermediate representations are used to insulate modellers from the complexities of the underlying representations. Rubrics are dissected into an intermediate format which can then be translated into GRAIL expressions using tools such as the SPET and TIGGER [29]. The modelling process is often interactive, requiring a certain level of performance from the classification engines which form the heart of the terminology server. Early implementations were built in Smalltalk a language supporting rapid prototyping and the easy construction of user ....

J. E. Rogers, S. W. D., A. L. Rector, P. Pole, P. Zanstra, and E. van der Haring. Rubrics to Dissections to GRAIL to Classifications. In To appear in: MIE 97, 1997.

Online articles have much greater impact   More about CiteSeer.IST at NUS   Add search form to your site   Submit documents   Feedback  

CiteSeer.IST at NUS - Copyright Penn State and NEC. Hosted by the School of Computing, National University of Singapore.